Multi-criteria analysis of urbanized area development concepts
Abstract
The article deals with sustainable construction and the evaluation of its elements using Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). The object of the research is the analysis of the concepts of the arrangement of the territory located in the Pilaitė district, Vilnius. Three spatial planning concepts are being developed and assessed against three groups of indicators, each consisting of 4–5 indicators. The analyzed groups of indicators were selected on the basis of the social, economic and environmental dimensions of sustainable construction. The summative method of relationship evaluation ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) was chosen to evaluate the spatial planning concept.
Article in Lithuanian.
Urbanizuotos teritorijos vystymo koncepcijų daugiakriterė analizė
Santrauka
Straipsnyje nagrinėjama tvari plėtra ir jos elementų vertinimas daugiakriteriais sprendimų priėmimo metodais – DSPM (angl. Multi Criteria Decision Making, MCDM). Tyrimo objektu pasirinkta teritorijos, esančios Pilaitės mikrorajone, Vilniaus mieste, vystymo koncepcijų analizė. Parengiamos trys teritorijos vystymo koncepcijos, kurios vertinamos pagal tris rodiklių grupes, kurių kiekvieną sudaro 4–5 rodikliai. Nagrinėjamos rodiklių grupės pasirinktos remiantis tvarios plėtros socialine, ekonomine ir aplinkosaugos dimensijomis. Teritorijos vystymo koncepcijai vertinti pasirinktas suminis santykių įvertinimo ARAS (angl. Additive Ratio Assessment) metodas.
Reikšminiai žodžiai: tvari plėtra, urbanizuota teritorija, teritorijos sutvarkymas, daugiakriterė analizė, ARAS.
Keyword : sustainable construction, urban area, landscaping, multi-criteria analysis, ARAS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Antuchevičienė, J. ir Stasiulionis, A. (2012). Statybos verslo projektavimas ir investicijos. Technika. https://doi.org/10.3846/1358-S
Citify. (n. d.) „UNUM“: verslo centro projektas. https://citify.lt/unum/?fbclid=IwAR3qzRubjfW0WxE5IMLaSUOw5Pohxe6Z7AYOLw-iC_kif8RolpW2ka4tYRo
Cortinovis, C., Haase, D., Zanon, B., & Geneletti, D. (2019). Is urban spatial development on the right track? Comparing strategies and trends in the European Union. Landscape and Urban Planning, 181, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.007
Dobrovolskienė, N., Tamošiūnienė, R., Banaitis, A., Ferreira, F. A., Banaitienė, N., Taujanskaitė, K., & Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, I. (2019). Developing a composite sustainability index for real estate projects using multiple criteria decision making. Operational Research, 19(3), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-017-0365-y
Eckenrode, R. T. (1965). Weighting multiple criteria. Management Science, 12(3), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.12.3.180
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making (pp. 58–191). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2018). A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision, 57(9), 2501–2519. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458
Ighravwe, D. E., & Oke, S. A. (2019). A multi-criteria decision-making framework for selecting a suitable maintenance strategy for public buildings using sustainability criteria. Journal of Building Engineering, 24, 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100753
Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybė. (2002). Subalansuotosios plėtros įgyvendinimo nacionalinė ataskaita. http://www.am.lt/LSP/files/SUB-PLET-NACAT.pdf
MacCrimmon, K. R. (1968). Decisionmaking among multiple-attribute alternatives: A survey and consolidated approach. The Rand Corporation.
Medineckienė, M., Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2010, May 19–21). Multi-criteria selection of the one flat dwelling house, taking into account the construction impact on environment. In 10th International Conference “Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques” (pp. 455–460). Technika.
Polasky, S., Kling, C. L., Levin, S. A., Carpenter, S. R., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., & Lubchenco, J. (2019). Role of economics in analyzing the environment and sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(12), 5233–5238. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901616116
Rashid, K., Rehman, M. U., de Brito, J., & Ghafoor, H. (2020). Multi-criteria optimization of recycled aggregate concrete mixes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124316
Ruzgys, A., Volvačiovas, R., Ignatavičius, Č., & Turskis, Z. (2014). Integrated evaluation of external wall insulation in residential buildings using SWARA-TODIM MCDM method. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.843585
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Salas, J., & Yepes, V. (2020). Enhancing sustainability and resilience through multi-level infrastructure planning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 962. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030962
Sánchez-Garrido, A. J., Navarro, I. J., & Yepes, V. (2021). Neutrosophic multi-criteria evaluation of sustainable alternatives for the structure of single-family homes. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 106572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106572
Sánchez-Garrido, A. J., Navarro, I. J., & Yepes, V. (2022). Multi-criteria decision-making applied to the sustainability of building structures based on Modern Methods of Construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129724
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods. In Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study (pp. 5–21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6_2
Turskis, Z., Goranin, N., Nurusheva, A., & Boranbayev, S. (2019). Information security risk assessment in critical infrastructure: A hybrid MCDM approach. Informatica, 30(1), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2019.203
Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., & Kosareva, N. (2015). A hybrid model based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy WASPAS for construction site selection. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 10(6), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2015.6.2078
United Nations. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf
Wei, Y., Huang, C., Lam, P. T., & Yuan, Z. (2015). Sustainable urban development: A review on urban carrying capacity assessment. Habitat International, 46, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.015
Xu, L., & Yang, J. B. (2001). Introduction to multi-criteria decision making and the evidential reasoning approach (Working Paper No. 0106). Manchester School of Management.
Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10
Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Šaparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2013). Multi-criteria assessment of facades’ alternatives: Peculiarities of ranking methodology. Procedia Engineering, 57, 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.016
Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Vilutiene, T., & Adeli, H. (2018). Sustainable decision-making in civil engineering, construction and building technology. Sustainability, 10(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010014
Zavadskas, E. K., Mardani, A., Turskis, Z., Jusoh, A., & Nor, K. M. (2016). Development of TOPSIS method to solve complicated decision-making problems – An overview on developments from 2000 to 2015. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15(03), 645–682. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622016300019