Evaluation of the main standards for sustainable buildings and evaluation BIM details in the commercial project
Abstract
This article evaluates key building standards and BIM details. With the growing focus on environmental protection and the growing popularity of these certifications, the key sustainability assessment standards are analysed to assess their strengths and weaknesses. Using the Building Information Modelling (BIM) methodology makes it easier, quicker and more efficient to achieve the intended criteria. Similarly, BIM allows simulations to be carried out, thus facilitating the selection and implementation of energy criteria by ensuring the desired class. The study uses the data from a real implemented commercial project.
Article in Lithuanian.
Pagrindinių tvarių pastatų standartų ir BIM detalumo vertinimas prekybos paskirties projekto pavyzdžiu
Santrauka
Šiame straipsnyje vertinami pagrindiniai tvarių pastatų standartai ir BIM detalumus. Didėjant dėmesiui aplinkosaugai ir augant šių sertifikatų populiarumui, analizuojami pagrindiniai tvarumo vertinimo standartai, įvertinant jų privalumus ir trūkumus. Taikant statinio informacinio modeliavimo (BIM) metodologiją, galima lengviau, greičiau ir efektyviau pasiekti numatytus kriterijus. Taip pat BIM leidžia atlikti simuliacijas, todėl palengvina energinių kriterijų parinkimą ir įgyvendinimą užtikrinant siekiamą klasę. Tyrime naudojami realiai įgyvendinto prekybos paskirties pastato projekto duomenys.
Reikšminiai žodžiai: tvarumo vertinimas, standartai, BIM, BREEAM, LEED, DGNB, prekybos paskirties projektai.
Keyword : sustainability evaluation, standards, BIM, BREEAM, LEED, DGNB, commercial projects
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Azhar, S. (2011). Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 11(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127
BIM taikymo būdai. (2017). Vadovas. Versija 1.0. Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas, Statinių skaitmeninio ir informacinio modeliavimo centras.
BREEAM. (2016). BREEAM International New Construction 2016 Technical Manual SD233 2.0. BRE Global. https://tools.breeam.com/filelibrary/Technical%20Manuals/BREEAM_Internation-al_NC_2016_Technical_Manual_2.0.pdf
Sun, C., Jiang, S., Skibniewski, M. J., Man, Q., & Shen, L. (2017). A literature review of the factors limiting the application of BIM in the construction industry. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 23(5), 764–779. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1087071
DGNB system. (2016). DGNB GmbH. https://www.dgnb-system.de/en/system/evaluation_and_awards/
BREEAM. (2019). Explore BREEAM. Explore the data behind BREEAM projects. BRE Global. https://tools.breeam.com/projects/explore/
Gilligan, B., & Kunz, J. (2007). VDC use in 2007: significant value, dramatic growth, and apparent business opportunity. TR171, 36.
LEED. (2016). Green building leadership and LEED. U.S. Green Building Council. https://new.usgbc.org/leed
Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery (4th ed.) (p. 23). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Kreider, R. G., & Messner, J. I. (2013). The uses of BIM. Classifying and Selecting BIM (9th version). Pennsylvania State University.
Migilinskas, D., Popov, V., Juocevicius, V., & Ustinovichius, L. (2013). The benefits, obstacles and problems of practical BIM implementation. Procedia Engineering, 57, 767–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.097
Nisbet, N., & Dinesen, B. (2010). Constructing the business case: Building information modelling. London, UK: British Standards Institution.
Soulti, E., & Leonard, D. (2016). Value of BREEAM: A review of the latest thinking in the commercial building sector. BRE Global. http://files.bregroup.com/breeam/briefingpapers/BREEAM-Briefing-Paper----The-Value-of-BREEAM--November-2016----123864.pdf
Šarka, V. (2018). Tarptautiniai statybų sektoriaus skaitmeninimo aspektai. VŠĮ „Skaitmeninė statyba“. https://skaitmeninestatyba.lt/tarptautiniai-statybu-sektoriaus-skaitmeninimo-aspektai/
Vilutienė, T., Migilinskas, D., & Bružas, A. (2015). Holistic approach to assess the sustainability and utility of refurbishment measures. Procedia Engineering, 122, 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.017